Blue UFO.
Recently my brother was on a flight back from Florida and they were over the ocean and were told they were over 30,000 feet high. My brother just happened to be filming outside his window and what he captured was amazing and shocking.
This video as it is 100% real. Other passengers on the plane at the window saw the same thing but only my brother and another lady had time to shoot it. My brother not only shot it but took video of it.
It’s clear that it is a UFO and the shocking thing is this thing did not move. It was hovering and its not a weather balloon or sate-light . It has a large glowing blue dome and is glowing and as the plane moved it stayed still.
It also appeared to just hover there and was bigger than a bill board you would see on a highway and the shape is almost a triangle. The FAA is already aware of it as it was reported by people on the flight and the pilots ran out of the cock pit as soon as the plane landed.
There is an investigation under way as this is clearly something out of a UFO movie. My brother also contacting CNN and other media outlets about this event.
Source and author: riadbsc2004 * link video UFO
light on top of a mountain peak for low flying planes? arent they usually flashing with red as well?
sorry, it looks like the top of a building.
Dr. Smallberries,
You could be right but you say it so casually as if you see buildings like this a lot.
I’ve seen my fair share of contemporary architecture and can’t say I’ve ever seen a blue sphere glowing on top. Maybe in Vegas but if you’ve personally seen a building like this what building was it?
Its good to be skeptical to ensure you’re not being dupe though.
And why say “sorry”, like your dashing everybody’s hopes or something.
Who exactly are you apologizing to… others or yourself?
It’s very unique indeed, and still open to debunking, unless you have more info on the buildings you see in your travels that look similar.
-B
It LOOKS like the top of a building, but if we’re to believe the reported
height of the ‘plane, as 30,000 ft, it can’t possibly be the top of a building.
Something here, is wrong!
For those who take the whole story into account, this is just one persons account, if it surfaces in the pilots stories or the other lady (as he describes) then it will have more credibility with me, until then it stands that this could have just been a plane coming in to land (wouldn’t be takeoff as the angle of ascent is very high, whereas decent is relatively level) and not at 30000ft, and this building appeared out the window shrouded in a low cloud layer, then the guy took a video and made a story to go with it, just a skyscraper shrouded in cloud, id bet if they posted the coordinates it would have been directly over a city. I’m willing to bet someone will recognize the building from non clouded fly overs and post pictures somewhere (im currently looking myself but ‘FI PA USA blue light top of building’ isn’t much of a narrowed search), ive also searched 3 flight paths to and from Fi and PA, each come near large buildings on decent. Its typical of these sorts of stories to be missing major detail, for example, what time was the flight? flight number? flight path? which airports was it between? until i get more detail this is another null story, if it was me id be taking down every bloody detail to make it credible, along with other peoples accounts.
Luke
agree
Hey Luke,
This ones a bit tricky to discern but I’m leaning more on the “for” side.
Those questions you asked are good and need answering but might not be so I’m going to use what we’re given.
I’m looking at the object itself and particularly the clouds. Firstly, if its another plane making a descent it shouldn’t appear stationery as it does in the video, exactly how he described it as just “hovering there”. He gets one tick based on my experience with aeroplanes.
Its not moving and if landing the blue light bally-me-jiggy thing and the fuselage should be beginning to be obscured by the clouds. All planes are constantly in motion and won’t appear like this in my experience.
The blue light thing…..
Aeroplane lights usually display multiple colours, red, white etc and rarely in 1 colour alone. Judging by the distance between the airliner and the “object” the size of the blue ball seems very large indeed, also another feature that isn’t typical of light aircraft or passenger jets. The most pro-dominant features spherical in nature would be the engines. Signal and running lights just like on some boats are located in multiple locations and rarely have 1 large signalling light which can only be viewed from a certain perspective.
Close proximity to the witnesses airliner…
It’s also extremely close to the witnesses aircraft, a little too close.. Commercial airliners would rarely fly in such close proximity to each other under any circumstances. I’m ruling out a plane personally. The light seems out of place, and the absence of a flight vector making it appear stationery doesn’t convince me.
Cloud formation and density…
Smog, and fog would indeed cover skyscrapers and buildings but from what is briefly shown these appear to be proper clouds formed in the mid to upper part of the troposphere. Air will get colder as the altitude increases and judging from where the witness airliner is they appear to be above the tropopause where most clouds you’ll see in a passenger jet will not be visibly forming.
Especially forming ” a barrier” if you will between the clouds edge and the lack of cloud formation between this point and the passenger jet itself. It appears to be right on the edge of the tropopause but its not a solid barrier and can change in storms and heavy weather.
But, the appearance of quite possibly the tropopause and the cessation of clouds from where the jet is down to the object would also rule out a skyscraper.
The tallest skyscraper is the Burj Khalifa at just under 830metres/2800feet and its tip is very recognizable even if only seen once.
If a skyscraper or large building was constructed vying for the title of worlds biggest we would have a pretty good idea of the appearance of the tip.
With the atmospheric conditions near or above the tropopause it would be beyond our current capabilities to construct a building of such immense size.
BUT, in saying that if they are in a storm front it could be a building, albeit an extremely unique one so I can’t confidently rule out the building theory but initial observations and my basic understanding of cloud formations, the troposhere, and the tropopause point to an anomaly.
We would agree that this is DEFINITELY large in size however and unless its a skyscraper, other buildings may be visible close by. Clouds are obstructing the view but I cannot see any others buildings in the short video.
So many things are pointing to an anomaly, but I’ll confidently rule out any civilian aircraft, passenger jet or “disclosed” military aircraft. Because even if moving at similar “cruising” speeds the object should remain in relatively unnoticed sync with each other, but the airliner does indeed overtake it from the beginning of the video to the end of the video. It’s not moving anywhere and no aeroplanes behave in this manner except for vertical short takeoff and landing (V/STOL) aircraft like the Harrier Jump Jet.
We need those other questions answered about it being a building though but a building of such a height with a blue spherical light on its tip would be easy to Google. I could be wrong but instincts are telling me otherwise.
-B
well brett, very good points, however, the notion of it being another aircraft (commercial or otherwise) does not hold water as you have put, this is why some think it a UFO. Also in regards to it being a skyscraper, the only story we have to go on right now is this one guy saying it was at 30000 ft, whereas it could have been down to 2500ft or lower, with it being said that it is a skyscraper, it may not be, it may actually be a smaller tall building and just a ground level fog cover, it may be that this plane is actually in a holding stack until weather permits landing. Also i have searched for buildings with blue lights on top and the only thing that seems to come up is pictures of the empire state building, even when I put in states like Florida, still more ESB, unfortunately this is the way with image searches.
It all comes down to corroboration, until we get another account of this story we cannot know if even the flight path is true, was it a flight from FI to PA? was it at 30000ft (cruising altitude)? Did the pilots see it? did the old woman see it? if so many of the other passengers saw it, why are there no more accounts?
these are the points you need to focus on brett, it really helps in weeding out footage that has no reference points and no corroboration, Im a believer in such things at heart but when someone spouts a story about half a plane seeing something, but only one guy makes a story about it, it just sounds a bit fabricated, i mean if you were on a flight and saw something in the air at 30000 ft, with today’s iphones and internet, the internet would be flooded with images on twitter and Facebook and some videos later on YouTube, not to mention personal witness accounts from everybody on board who saw it and most likely a news story (BTW he said they’ve sent the story into the news, haven’t seen anything on it), the facts are needed to make this story real and right now all it has is one persons… brothers, account (sort of sounds like fish tales… my brothers uncles, sister, twice removed, caught nessie in the outback with a stick and kangaroo tail).
Luke
Hey Luke,
Very true, it does sound quite fanciful and with so many “specifics” from not even the supposed witness it must be taken with a grain of salt.
I would’ve advised them personally to give the footage to MUFON and avoid mainstream media outlets for obvious reasons, they cannot be trusted with the truth.
Or perhaps they were shown the footage and said, you fool that’s the blah blah building in blah blah county etc.
Certain reference points can already be corroborated but not enough to satisfy reasonable doubt.
I can’t say it is completely without some nuggets of truth but, other possibilities non so fanciful could be containment and withholding of other “eyewitness” testimony. The pilots themselves could’ve been threatened by some official body like the FAA to be silent or risk losing there jobs. Other passengers video could’ve been suppressed. BUT by the same token we all remember the Alex Jones “Bohemian Grove” video to be completely bullshit.
The absence of any other testimony is very suspect but it does not seem like an aircraft (personal opinion) to me and does not display any of the physics as such. I can very well be a building but likewise is not like any contemporary architecture I’ve ever seen, but I haven’t seen every building in every city.
Half truths are suspect to me also but the jury is still out and the lack of any such readily available images of such a unique building makes it all the much harder. I hate fence sitting but I suppose it keeps things getting out of hand. Believing so easily makes you vulnerable to deception.. If they lied about it, I’d like to slap trolls like this because they make it harder for the rest of us.
Inconclusive… Grrr
hehe
Cheers Luke
-B
Good post Luke, agree 100%….
Yes we need all the details and as you say Luke you would want to give every bit of information to support its credibility! There’s not enough information to support this story and video.
Context/Pretext should always be the main focus when we see and/or hear something unidentified.
100% agree with Luke here.
Disagree RB, scientific method is more useful FOR ME. I see your method as an invalid argument that will encourage critical thinking aka a logical paradox. (We are further discussing this now are we not? So its useful when we’re using text, like right now because data is missing) Certainly if reading a book or writing an essay. +1 indeed. Specifically describing an event that isn’t established fact in a non-existent paradigm doesn’t work so well. There’s a reason why conTEXT and preTEXT have those specific letters in that specific order because it is specifically better used with such a medium. My best asset is observe and research.. I think so anyway but nobody has all the data as yet, 100 percents and absolutes without objectivity using subjectivity as a reason and missing data will led you to invalid arguments. (But I’m not saying don’t say what you said, it has its place yes, right here right now with us discussing it because the jury is still out ) Not saying I’m right, more that both approaches, yours + scientific method expressed by other debaters (me) compliment each other and further discussion until the facts are established and can be reproduced to anybody wishing to observe it. Then neither of us will probably take any notice
Hey B, I hope that all is well.
I understand your point and agree with much of what you have shared…For me, the context/pretext builds the foundation for all other information (research, observation, experimentation, experience) to be built upon.
Im just more of a context first type of guy.
Amazing! Realy amazing
Hey RB,
True mate, sometimes I just like probing (pun intended) to get the discussion going further and will jump on the other side of the fence just to see other peoples methodology of how they reach there conclusions.
My half science method is useful to a point but Luke’s right I concede the reference points need to be established facts before confirming its genuineness.
All is well with me, cheers
I live in Western Australia and its our hottest summer in 70 years!! Friggin’ Hot as! The Eastern states and or smaller Island state Tasmania is pretty much on fire! Fires and heatwaves, scary stuff. Reasonably safe where we are though!
Cheers mate
-B
the QLD heatwave just started today, it was already in the high 20′s at 6am, i think a trip to pools in the next half hour will be good
Luke
I’m astonished that nobody has said the 3 most common letters affiliated with MOST unidentified flying object videos yet…
C .G . I!
Is it not obvious to everyone that 99% of the UFO videos you see are fake? Any schmuck can buy software… Add that up with an incredibly uneventful life & unlimited access / time to create a SHORT clip with ZERO evidence / proof / follow up and voila; 213523552 youtube hits filled with comments ranging from “ducks” to “helicopters” to “Er ma gawd itz da Aliens” to “they come from my home planet of _____”…. If you can’t recognize real from fake via your own senses, you might as well be a religious nut who relies on something rewritten 5000x to consolidate power to those in charge. What’s History? HIS story. Who’s story? The winners. BAM! Religion 101.
ET’s will never openly reveal themselves to us because our brains don’t process their physical existence. Much like a DOS CPU attempting to run Windows 8. Broaden your minds. Expand your senses. Study metaphysics. Then, you will understand that EVERYTHING; including The Universe is ALL in your mind through genetic and conscious evolution.
Regards.
I’ld estimate more like 70% are fake.
There is just SO much more UFO activity these days that people only need to fake the Really good stuff.
40 yrs ago your stat would be closer to 96% though, ill grant you that, but 40 years ago it was also more difficult to fake.
As for proof, well, thats subjective, there’s little to nothing some one could argue as proof that some one else could not argue reasonably against.
All we can do, is gather, document, cross reference and compare, investigate and make educated summations.
The real evidence for me these days lies in the shear Volume and the similarity of sightings.
Sounds like me… Very cynical.
@ MrVolatile
Agree’d but evidence to me is when I see something and go “what the fuck is that?!” Oppose to “Really? Humans are that stupid?” Lol. The only real UFOs I’ve seen we’re in the sky via my own eyes. Everything else to me is extremely invalidated. Including news, consumerism, etc. Especially when I can go to the local CPU shop to acquire software that rivals big budget movie CGI. I’m sure someone of your mental capacity can understand my P.O.V Vara.
Regards
actually I Do.
I approach most reports or so called evidence with an overly critical amount of skepticism.
But, i do Not do so with a discouraging negative or defeatist attitude or perspective.
I Do so from a reasonably objective one. (i hope)
i prefer to use terms like easily fooled or some what prone to gullibility, rather than Stupid, just for example.
its not so much a question of intellect in most cases as it is environmental and life long conditioning, which creates this problem.
It is easier to fool a person, than it is to convince one they have already been fooled. ~ Samuel Clemens said something akin to that.
There are factions which have Fooled people into thinking that Aliens do NOT exist. Or that we have Not been visited or influenced. If we believe other wise it will be our difficult task to show them other wise.
Doing so WHILE calling them stupid is not going to accelerate this process.
Just food for thought.
~ VARAKIENEN.
This site seems more and more a fight to be the most intelligent with people arguing against each other. I understand the need to debate about a topic but then it seems to turn into an argument of understanding and power of knowledge. This is why I’m not posting as many of my opinions with fear I might be made to look inferior. Just IMO.
you’re right theTruth.. I’m guilty of it too :/
Having a high IQ does not equate to a high level of EQ.
If one cannot talk with, relate with, or share with another in a respectful manner, their intelligence means little.
Peace,
intellect (as defined) – a. The ability to learn and reason; the capacity for knowledge and understanding. b. The ability to think abstractly or profoundly.
I really like the whole ability to think abstractly or profouondly…..which is not an everyday learned occurrence. So let’s be tolerant towards one another, everyone has something meaningful to offer and only thru peaceful, respectful exchange can the “truth behind the scenes” beneficially brought to light.
Love this site, but I find a great need as in most of the internet nowadays full of negativity galvanizing especially masquerading as unique knowledge….share for the sake of sharing, more peace is advanced.
That does not include rudeness or mean spirited comments ofcourse!!
LET PEACE BE THE LOUDEST VOICE!
It sure is good to speculate and wonder what this was…as it will also improve our respective power of reasoning and then be READY for the real thing when it comes..alien craft, top secret govt craft or even planet Nibiru and her armada.
ppcl you just put the words to my thoughts haha, some people think the whole debunking is just negative thinking and non believing, but it is just another tool to weed out the non stories, disinfo and to actually find the truth behind something. Blind faith leads you nowhere, under the blind faith of the church we would still be the centre of the universe and the earth would be flat, we would be the only planet capable of supporting life and the earth would only be 4000 years old.
Outside thinking, and discerning the facts are what leads us to the true discoveries.
Take care
Luke
I agree with Luke whole heartedly here.
I firmly believe that the debunking process is a necessary step in weeding out the rubbish and getting to the truth.
BOTH side of an argument are heavy with bias and tricks of wording and presentation which leave some facts out and force you to fixate on what They WANT you to see to bring you over to their point of view.
For example, I LOVE the show called ancient Aliens, But I know for a Fact that a great deal of their information is inaccurate, distorted, and in some cases just blatantly out right False.
I have seen other documentaries which refute a great deal of what is being said on ancient aliens effectively, but I am Also similarly aware that they use a great deal of the same methods. Inaccuracies, distorted views, and in some cases complete false hoods. Often difficult to spot when they paint so good a picture, But the picture is often only two dimensional showing you only one side of the so called facts.
Only thinking out side their box that they want you thinking in will allow you to see the clever distortions and house of cards.
I will give you an example of an Excellent refuting documentary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ
But, I can pick a great deal of these notions apart, just as they for the most part successfully pick apart a great deal of what Ancient aliens has to say.
In the end, I trust neither fully, but know there are details that Both present which are truth.
I still believe Fully that we were visited and taught a great many things by ancient aliens. But did those aliens do the work FOR us? In most cases unlikely.
Any Good investigator has to be prepared to hear Both sides of the debate with an equally open minded perspective.
The question IS now, just how Objective and Good an investigator and knowledge gatherer are You if you do Not take in absolutely ALL evidences on All sides, and give all equal unbiased consideration.
~ VARAKIENEN.
Do please watch that documentary, it gives great perspective.
TO EVERYBODY, RON THE ADMIN IS FINE AND BUILDING ANOTHER SITE here: http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com.au/
TO THE SITES CURRENT DICTATORS:
DONT LIKE THE TRUTH DO YOU!? THEN WHAT THE HELL WERE YOU DOING BEING PART OF THIS SITE, GET OVER YOURSELVES AND GET REAL, THIS SITE IS DYING SLOWLY AND MORE AND MORE BY YOU DELETING YOUR BIGGEST AND MOST VALUABLE CONTRIBUTORS (NOT DISCOUNTING ANYONE HERE) COMMENTS, DON’T YOU REALIZE SITE VIEWS/COMMENTS ETC ARE WHAT MAKE MONEY ON SITES LIKE THIS!? OR ARE YOU THICK IN THE HEAD ENOUGH TO BELIEVE MONEY GROWS ON TREES, NOW YOUVE HAD YOUR POWER PLAY, YOUVE TRIED TO DEFAME THE ONE TRUE CONTRIBUTOR ON THIS SITE, THE TRUE PUBLIC FACE TO ALL OF US, AND YOU’RE TRYING TO HAVE US ‘STAY TUNED’ FOR MORE GARBAGE?? WELL GUESS WHAT, WERE NOT STAYING TUNED, THIS SITE WILL NOT SURVIVE AND THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THIS SITE A GOOD PLACE TO COME AND DISCUSS ARE GONE.
GOODBYE
AND SINCE THERE IS NO NEED FOR TOU ANYMORE AS YOURE ALREADY DELETING ANYTHING YOU CANT TAKE, I THINK THAT ALL CAPS IS A GREAT WAY TO SEND THIS MESSAGE OFF.
ALSO DONT BOTHER BLOCKING MY ACCOUNT, I HAVE MANY MANY MORE, IM GOING TO BE A BIG THORN IN YOUR SIDE
(DISGRUNTLED, ANNOYED AND FEELING LIKE A BIT OF SPAMMING) LUKE